Hard disks, solid state drives

HDD, SSDForum → Discussion drives Seagate Barracuda 7200. 11 and ES. 2

Discussion drives Seagate Barracuda 7200. 11 and ES. 2

30.08.2007 20:15:00
In Seagate's official website has information on the new line of hard drives Barracuda® 7200. 11 and Barracuda® ES. 2
line is very interesting. It remains to be seen when these drives will reach Russia. If you have any information on this matter, leave comments in this thread
30.08.2007 22:26:00
I am also waiting for, but it seems they will appear not only in Russia, but also from the bourgeoisie at the end of September - early October. Just as new 333gb Samsungi on pancakes.
04.09.2007 15:08:00
Who can normally explain that for gonivo online why the average search speed for about 1 ST3250610NS, 0 ms, from where?

Random read seek time & lt; 1. 0 msec
Random write seek time & lt; 1. 2 msec

http: // www. seagate. com / ww / v / index. jsp? locale = en-US & a ... mp; reqPage = Model #
04.09.2007 16:29:00
This nanotechnology turbocharging. Apparently
truck-to-truck beguiled.
17.09.2007 1:48:00
There is no one data how much more wait for a new line? I'd like to quickly change Hardy
19.09.2007 1:35:00
Yes, the miracle did not work on the seagate site in Speke:

Seek Time
Average Read / Write (msec) - 8. 5/9. 5
Track-to-Track Read / Write (msec) - 0. 8/1. 0


Buy - in sunny California
21.09.2007 9:38:00
I wonder how much will be asked of terabytes Wait
30.09.2007 18:48:00
Somebody had seen on sale?
01.10.2007 16:03:00
anyone has seen in the sale?

Hitachi 1TB seen
01.10.2007 22:35:00

in. fi such prices: 500 - 137e, 750 - 221e, 1TB - 313e. Just began to appear in the presence in the store, all lacking. . .
01.10.2007 22:44:00

At Hitachi is 5-poo platter, the last century, we do not need such
02.10.2007 9:50:00
These
as you delicately put it, "shit" - only really present in the market and validated by leading OEMami terabaytniki (in three versions - desktops, servers and BREA). A 5-platter design has a MTBF 1 of 2 million. H. So you do not really need such .
03.10.2007 17:37:00

to us, for example, will soon come terabaytniki Seagate ST31000340AS and ST31000340NS, although amounts as true noticed, leave much to be desired.
03.10.2007 19:13:00

Yes, I know, Chariton said . Coming soon - there is two or three weeks?
04.10.2007 2:33:00

now remove any reservations about validation, and see that they have a minimum of two weeks is not even the only ones here. Speed ​​is with its 5 pancakes they lose even 750kam competitors.
04.10.2007 14:06:00

same speed with its 5 pancakes they lose even 750kam competitors.
On lope parrots?
04.10.2007 15:09:00

you still think that the main thing in hard drives - speed?
04.10.2007 17:28:00

11 series of fish more sophisticated and it is important Hitachiki already mentally old wonder what in terabyte size and HP offer gnusmas
04.10.2007 17:33:00

Hitachiki already morally old
And what is expressed in practical terms?
04.10.2007 17:41:00

11 series of fish more sophisticated and it is morally important Hitachiki old
And you can not dispose of common words and more?
04.10.2007 19:05:00

Is it not obvious
04.10.2007 19:16:00

Is not it obvious
Who?
I like myself a couple of rustles and all very wonderful
04.10.2007 22:06:00

On lope parrots?
38!


And you think that after the competitors have released the best product, someone cares, who was the first?
04.10.2007 23:01:00
v
05.10.2007 6:29:00

competitors have released the best product - and what is the "luchshest" expressed?
05.10.2007 9:48:00

seems that he is on 4 discs, and therefore faster. In theory at least.

Is not it obvious
Nea. So what is their rapid obsolescence?
05.10.2007 15:54:00

Well what, just the same figures 4 and 5, 200, and 250 gigs. . And come out Hardy with a new density, and Duc. 11 become old turd. But for now we're just waiting for them because they are pretty
05.10.2007 16:02:00

simple as figures 4 and 5
As these figures reflect can say at real speed?
05.10.2007 16:59:00

200 and 250 gigs
Yes, the speed will vary right on the procedure.

Take the screws of the same family. One 500 GB (3 Disc / 6 heads), the second 400 (also 3/6). The density of respectively 167 and 133. According to your classification, the first - cool, the second - a turd. So?

yet here we are waiting for them, because they are pretty
Well, wait. People have long used the normal thousanders and grief do not know. And you - wait.

because they pretty
No more questions I have.
05.10.2007 17:26:00

Yes I speed it is considered, I'm not an accountant

And tests have storagereview (only the ES. 2, no. 11), but better not to look, not to get upset
05.10.2007 17:40:00

Yes I speed it is considered
Why do you then speed?
05.10.2007 17:40:00

ES. 2 - do not for desktops. . .


Why do you then speed?
presumably to show off in front of korefanami.

05.10.2007 17:51:00
Yes I'm talking about the speed did not write anything, it's about them, you have got it I talked about the pancakes.
05.10.2007 18:01:00

I talked about the pancakes.
what?
05.10.2007 20:15:00

and what is the "luchshest" expressed?
around. speed, consumption, noise and so forth.
06.10.2007 9:54:00

What "What"? You want something from me, something that I Hitachi bought the pack for you? Do not come to this, because it a lot of pancakes!
06.10.2007 10:14:00
They
Hitachi separate batches not trade, they sell them only in the server and storage. And so what you pancakes across the consciousness arose? Who cares how many pancakes?


As for energy consumption in the start and speed - it's all good, look the same storadzhrevyushny review and its final part. As for noise and heat at work - yes, it is there, but not so critical (especially about the noise - see colleagues reviews, acquired our terabaytnik). So you have got excited, in my humble opinion.

06.10.2007 11:11:00

I have no idea. God told me to (c)
soul yearns for new siageytov, although my last Hardy (320-ki 3 Hitachi 1 siageyt) is Siageyt departed a month later, was supposed to remain an unpleasant aftertaste.

have new gnusmas F1 (which of course also not be available for us) at all 3 pancake. But Samsung is not kosher, alas.
06.10.2007 11:17:00

Ah, well, well. . . With this guy to me, of course, hard to compete in a conviction.
And also he said about non-kosher?
06.10.2007 13:51:00
quote ( FatAndy ):
And what you pancakes so across the consciousness arose? Who cares how many pancakes?

Does this mean that Hitachi does not plan to 1Tb HDD production in a smaller number of plates?
06.10.2007 14:03:00

Yes, is true. Why change mehdizayn, which has proved its reliability? Why without extreme need to increase the density of the plates, reducing yields on production and increasing bone?
06.10.2007 15:23:00
quote ():
Why change mehdizayn, which has proved its reliability? Why without extreme need to increase the density of the plates, reducing yields on production and increasing bone?

That is, you do not see the prospects of increasing the density per platter?
06.10.2007 19:27:00

This year, and in this design - not.
06.10.2007 23:20:00
quote ():
This year, and in this design - not.
And of announcements Hitachi at the end of last year, one would expect this year 1Tb HDD with a density of 250Gb per platter:

«... In the first quarter of 2007, Hitachi brought hard drive areal density half-way to the 345 Gbits / sq. in. mark with its new 1-TB 3. 5-inch Deskstar 7K1000. ... »
Details:
http: // www. hitachigst. com / hdd / research / recording_head / pr / index. html

In September 2006, Hitachi itself provoked the race for the recording density, has reported on the achievement of 345 Gbits / sq. in. But he withdrew from the race the outsider, and not giving in 2007 ready solutions with half the density.
09.10.2007 15:59:00
E.
. . Do not understand. You can again, in more detail? What does the past year, if brought and the reduced record clearly this year, that is after the fact? As for
provoked - it's quite a strange definition, you know . Not we such, Life is such.
Achieving a certain density is not an instant its use in the production, because there are the concept of the level yield plates lifecycle model range and investment cycle.
09.10.2007 21:27:00
It's time to tie this mechanics,
to pray on the SSD discs- and then live in the Stone Age
09.10.2007 22:23:00
quote ():
. . . Do not understand. You can again, in more detail? What does the past year, if brought and the reduced record clearly this year, that is after the fact?

This year, say ...

«... SAN JOSE, Calif. - (BUSINESS WIRE) --Sept. 13, 2006 - Hitachi Global Storage Technologies (Hitachi) has much more to celebrate than the birth of the hard drive, which happened 50 years ago today in San Jose, California. The company is also celebrating an areal density (1) achievement of 345 gigabits per square inch (Gbits / sq. In.) Using perpendicular magnetic recording (PMR) technology. This areal density, demonstrated in laboratory testing, represents an increase of more than two-and-a-half times the areal density of today's highest-capacity products. By 2009, Hitachi predicts that 345 Gbits / sq. in. would result in a two-terabyte (TB) 3. 5-inch desktop drive, a 400-gigabyte (GB) 2. 5-inch notebook drive or a 200-GB 1. 8-inch drive (2). In the first half of 2007, Hitachi expects to bring hard drive areal density half way to the 345 Gbits / sq. in. mark with a 1-TB 3. 5-inch product ... »
http: // www. photographyblog. com / index. php / weblog / comm ... rd_drive_in_2007 /
http: // www. cdrinfo. com / Sections / News / Details. aspx? NewsId = 18034

strange that you are not up to date.

quote:
Achieving a certain density is not an instant its use in the production, because there are the concept of the level yield plates lifecycle model range and investment cycle.

Achieving a certain density and timing of its application in the production, of course, depend on a number of factors, but in the case of Hitachi major factor in not applying the density achieved in the production of the number acted when the terms were filed its application - 13th. So we will not see, it seems, and 2Tb HDD on four plates in 2009 by Hitachi.

very good tool for the HDD test:
http: // www. steelbytes. com /? mid = 20

NCQ performance on Seagate 1TB 7200. 11:
http: // forums. storagereview. net / index. php? showtopic = ... tart = # entry245704

11.10.2007 21:18:00

I'm sorry, I did not realize what it was you were trying to tell. You mean that is not physically density reached 172. 5 Gb / sq. inch, Koya is half of 345? Yes, indeed, in the SPECA 149 Gb / sq. inch. AND?

in the case of Hitachi major factor in not applying the density achieved in the production of the number acted when the terms were filed its application - 13th. - right? Be sure to tell colleagues. They probably do not know as I do. . .
11.10.2007 22:57:00
quote ():
I'm sorry, I did not realize what it was you were trying to tell.


What a blunt You ...

quote:
You mean that is not physically density reached 172. 5 Gb / sq. inch, Koya is half of 345? Yes, indeed, in the SPECA 149 Gb / sq. inch. AND?
And? - Does not matter to me. I Hitachi is not working, and I do not need to bathe, to explain to customers why 200Gb per plate better than 250Gb.

HD Tach ST31000340AS 1Tb
http: // www. imagebanana. com / view / 14os1en4 / 7200. 11. JPG

HD Tach ST3500320AS 500Gb
http: // www. speedy. vuurwerk. nl / hdtach_7200_11. JPG
http: // img409. imageshack. us / img409 / 5236 / kovakfj1. jpg

HDD, SSDForum → Discussion drives Seagate Barracuda 7200. 11 and ES. 2

Discussion drives Seagate Barracuda 7200. 11 and ES. 2