Hard disks, solid state drives

HDD, SSDForum → IBM DPTA-371360. Not whether it is time to scrap?

IBM DPTA-371360. Not whether it is time to scrap?

Pages: 1
01.11.2001 9:30:00
Friends, tell me! .
2 years ago, has set itself the disc (13, 6 Gb). Total use is no problem.
Yes, and still have enough space.
BUT!
I plan to go on KT266A and Palomino. Would not screw this weak point in the future system?
it worth it in the aforesaid statement of the problem to change, for example, Barracudu IV?

Thanks in advance!

01.11.2001 10:20:00
I understand that this screw with IDE / UDMA-33 interface. In future systems, it may be a weak point in terms of speed.
01.11.2001 11:26:00
Why change?
If funds permit, screw buy newer, and this, just believe in its reliability under bakap leave and how to wear a portable floppy disk movies. And then he'll come in handy even years n.
01.11.2001 11:48:00

he udma66


do not change, it is better one fozmi as advised
dpta bottleneck in the system in any way will not be

01.11.2001 12:02:00

Thank you for the clarification. I read on himself page http: // www. storage. ibm. com / hdd / desk / ds34gxp. htm and verified.

Well then totally agree - it will not be a bottleneck.

01.11.2001 12:44:00
Thank you all for your advice.
The fact that he does not support ATA100 - it's probably no big deal.

remanded movies.

Pages: 1
HDD, SSDForum → IBM DPTA-371360. Not whether it is time to scrap?

IBM DPTA-371360. Not whether it is time to scrap?

info@www.hdd-and-ssd.com